Oggi nel sito ateistico più famoso d’Italia, il segretario Raffele Carcano si lamenta che quello delle Maldive sia “un altro paradiso illusorio”. Motivo, l’intolleranza del regime islamico verso i non credenti che pare abbia spinto al suicidio un ragazzo. Fatto triste, certo. Quello che interessa è il commento: L’ha fatto perché ateo, perché per gli atei non c’è posto in nessun paradiso. Davvero strappalacrime, il segretario di un’associazione che percepisce anche il cinque per mille per la sua attività of "social promotion" of fundamentalism. Always the UAAR is interested in religious intolerance. It might seem simple information, but its members are poor victim of a real manipulation.
Let me explain. The good news is if the Islamist turn kill the missionary, if Catholics and Protestants in Ireland if the damage of holy right. So that the unsuspecting reader reflects, and reveals in the comments, the implicit message: See? Religions suck, should be eliminated, only produce violence. The news is not good, or better there, but if the intolerance is an atheist. If a bishop is kidnapped and imprisoned by the Chinese regime always fighting the "superstition," then the news is not good. So if in the search of the site click on "Maldives" or "Pakistan" will find many posts. If you are looking for something in China, that is the paradise of atheists (who strangely does not know Carcano), you zero results. It remains only a few traces of the repression of Tibet, but without moral judgments or tearful Whereas it is only the victims atheist. And indeed, the few posts on Tibet to give many readers an excuse to show their sympathy to China to insult the atheist and Dalai Lama. China and the rest is the suicide capital of the world, just to stay on topic.
age of the Internet, chi può abboccare ad un’informazione così parziale e strumentale? Chi, se non i novelli e improvvisati Voltaire dell’illuminismo laico?
0 comments:
Post a Comment